Lesson Plan Formats: Hunter, 5E, Rosenshine and Backward Design Compared

A comparison of Hunter, 5E, Rosenshine, and backward design lesson plan formats to help you pick the right instructional structure.

Match the format to the job: use Hunter's elements for a single direct-teaching lesson, the 5E cycle for an inquiry lesson, a Rosenshine-style review-model-practice sequence for skill building, and backward design for planning a whole unit. At Chalkbox, we build practical classroom tools and guides.

Which Lesson Plan Format Fits Your Lesson

When planning an individual period, match your objective to one of these instructional pathways:

  • Choose Madeline Hunter's elements when you need to introduce new facts, demonstrate a specific procedure, and guide student practice before assigning solo work.
  • Choose the BSCS 5E Instructional Model when students must explore phenomena or conduct laboratory activities before you introduce formal terms.
  • Choose a Rosenshine review-model-practice sequence when your primary goal is achieving a high success rate on academic skills.
  • Choose backward design (Understanding by Design) when you are planning a whole unit.

Starting with a clear instructional objective allows you to determine whether students need explicit modeling or open exploration. In practice, write the objective before choosing activities and keep the plan short enough to use.

Comparing Four Lesson Plan Formats and One Habit

Lesson plan formats differ primarily in where they place teacher explanation and student exploration. The table below outlines how the major instructional designs compare across purpose, structure, and original sources.

FormatBest ForCore PartsSource
Madeline Hunter DesignDirect instruction of skills and conceptsAnticipatory set, purpose, input, modeling, guided practice, checking for understanding, independent practice, closureCSUN page; Wolfe (1987) on Hunter and Russell (1976)
BSCS 5E ModelInquiry science and concept discoveryEngagement, exploration, explanation, elaboration, evaluationBybee et al. (BSCS)
Rosenshine SequenceSystematic skill mastery and cognitive supportReview, modeling, guided practice, checking understanding, independent practiceRosenshine (2012)
Backward Design (UbD)Planning a whole unitNot set out on the ASCD page; plan the unit before the daily lessonsGrant Wiggins & Jay McTighe (ASCD)
Gradual Release HabitA common classroom pacing habitTeacher modeling, guided practice, independent practice (I do, we do, you do)Common classroom practice

Hunter's Elements: Eight on CSUN's List, Seven in Wolfe's

Madeline Hunter's framework provides a structured set of instructional components designed for direct teacher-led instruction. On its science education page titled "Elements of Lesson Design (Hunter)," California State University Northridge (CSUN) lists eight distinct elements: Anticipatory Set, Purpose, Input, Modeling, Guided Practice, Checking For Understanding, Independent Practice, and Closure. Anticipatory Set provides a brief prompt linking earlier work to today's task. Purpose clarifies why the skill matters. Input delivers concepts and vocabulary, while Modeling demonstrates what students are to learn. The teacher then facilitates Guided Practice, monitors responses through Checking For Understanding, assigns Independent Practice, and summarizes the period during Closure.

Patricia Wolfe writes that the elements are not a recipe to be followed step by step in every lesson. Writing in the February 1987 issue of Educational Leadership published by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD), Patricia Wolfe addressed this misconception in her article, "What the 'Seven-Step Lesson Plan' Isn't!" Wolfe explained that Hunter and Russell originally described seven elements to consider when designing a lesson in 1976: anticipatory set, objective, input, modeling, checking for understanding, guided practice, and independent practice. The CSUN list differs by including eight elements, adding Purpose alongside objective material and including Closure.

Wolfe clarified that Hunter and Russell did not label these elements as chronological steps. The "Seven-Step Lesson Plan" label emerged later. Wolfe emphasized that these elements are not a recipe to follow step by step in every single meeting. Instead, they represent professional considerations for planning instruction. In some lessons, a teacher might work through all elements in order. In other lessons, reordering the elements proves more appropriate for the learning goal.

The 5E Cycle for Inquiry Lessons

The 5E instructional model structures learning as a cycle where student investigation precedes direct teacher explanation. Described by Bybee et al. in The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins, Effectiveness, and Applications, the Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS) 5E Instructional Model consists of five phases: Engagement, Exploration, Explanation, Elaboration, and Evaluation. The framework descends from the Atkin and Karplus learning cycle developed in the early 1960s for the Science Curriculum Improvement Study (SCIS). BSCS has implemented the 5E framework across curriculum materials since the late 1980s, applying it to individual lessons, distinct units, and comprehensive multi-year programs.

Each phase in the 5E sequence serves a defined instructional function:

  1. Engagement: The teacher accesses prior knowledge and engages learners through short prompts that spark curiosity.
  2. Exploration: Students complete shared activities, such as laboratory investigations, where they identify concepts and experience conceptual change.
  3. Explanation: Students explain their understanding, and the teacher directly introduces formal vocabulary, concepts, or processes.
  4. Elaboration: The teacher challenges students to extend their conceptual understanding by applying skills to new problems.
  5. Evaluation: Students assess their own progress while the teacher evaluates student abilities against stated learning objectives.

To see how these five stages function inside a practical science unit, review our guide to the 5E lesson plan.

A Review-Model-Practice Sequence from Rosenshine

Rosenshine synthesized findings from cognitive science, research on master teachers, and research on cognitive supports into 10 research-based principles. In his article "Principles of Instruction," published in the Spring 2012 issue of American Educator by the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), Rosenshine outlined ten research-based principles drawn from cognitive research, studies of master teachers, and work on cognitive scaffolds. Master teachers were defined in these studies as educators whose classrooms achieved the highest gains on achievement tests.

Rosenshine's sequence highlights several core instructional actions:

  • Begin each lesson with a brief review of previous learning.
  • Provide models.
  • Guide student practice and provide scaffolds for difficult tasks.
  • Check for student understanding.
  • Require and monitor independent practice.
  • Engage students in weekly and monthly review.

Rosenshine stressed that effective teachers conduct experiential and hands-on activities after students understand the foundational material, rather than before. His synthesis highlighted the importance of obtaining a high success rate during student practice. Citing a study of fourth-grade mathematics classrooms, Rosenshine noted that students in the most successful classrooms answered questions correctly 82 percent of the time, compared to 73 percent in the least successful rooms. The research suggests the optimal success rate appears to be about 80 percent.

Backward Design and Gradual Release Habits

In practice, plan a whole unit before drafting individual daily agendas. In Understanding by Design, Expanded 2nd Edition (370 pages, ISBN 978-1-4166-0035-0), ASCD describes the work as "an award-winning framework for curriculum design that extolled the virtues of backward planning." Treat it as the format to reach for when you are planning a whole unit before writing any daily plan. To sketch a unit, try our unit plan generator.

Often summarized as "I do, we do, you do," gradual release describes a standard classroom pacing habit. The teacher demonstrates the skill first, leads the class through collaborative guided practice, and finally transitions students into independent work.

When Your School Requires a Template

A district may require its own template, so check before switching formats. None of the formats here is a substitute for that requirement. For the Philippines DepEd DLP format, see the DepEd lesson plan format. The four formats and the gradual release habit still help you decide what to put inside a required template.

Drafting Your Plan with Software Tools

Modern digital tools can format lesson plans into direct instruction, inquiry, or gradual release templates. An automated planner can populate any of these instructional formats. You can generate custom outlines quickly using our free lesson plan generator or evaluate options across our list of AI lesson plan generator alternatives.

Whenever you use automated planning software, you must personally verify the output. Select your target objective, choose the structure that matches your pedagogical task, and draft your next outline using these lesson plan formats.

Get the printable pack

Join the Chalkbox list for free printable packs and new tools — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently asked questions

What are the main types of lesson plans?

The main types of lesson plans include direct instruction models, inquiry learning cycles, cognitive skill sequences, and backward design unit frameworks. Direct instruction outlines like Madeline Hunter's elements guide explicit teacher modeling. Inquiry models like the BSCS 5E cycle organize exploration before formal vocabulary instruction.

What is the Madeline Hunter lesson plan format?

The Madeline Hunter format is a set of lesson-design elements: anticipatory set, purpose, input, modeling, guided practice, checking for understanding, independent practice and closure, according to one university list. The format identifies main elements such as modeling, guided practice, and checking for understanding. It serves as a planning guide for explicit teaching rather than an inflexible, mandatory checklist.

What is the 5E lesson plan format?

The 5E lesson plan format is an inquiry model consisting of engagement, exploration, explanation, elaboration, and evaluation. Used in BSCS curriculum materials since the late 1980s, the model descends from the Atkin and Karplus learning cycle of the early 1960s.

Do I have to use every Hunter element in every lesson?

No, you do not have to use all Hunter elements in every lesson period. As Patricia Wolfe observed in Educational Leadership, Hunter and Russell described instructional elements to consider rather than a rigid seven-step recipe. Teachers may use all elements in order or reorder them based on the lesson objective.

Which lesson plan format works best for new teachers?

No single format wins for new teachers, and the right one varies by school, so check your school's requirements first. In practice, write the objective before choosing activities and keep the plan short enough to use. Direct instruction works for showing a skill, while the 5E cycle fits an inquiry lesson.

Can an AI lesson planner write lessons in these formats?

Yes, an artificial intelligence (AI) lesson planner can generate draft lessons in direct instruction, 5E, or backward design formats. While automated generators structure the instructional sequence quickly, the classroom teacher remains responsible for reviewing the content and checking the accuracy of all curriculum standards codes.

Lesson plan requirements differ by school and district. This guide is general information for educators; check your own school's template and policies.