A comparison of Hunter, 5E, Rosenshine, and backward design lesson plan formats to help you pick the right instructional structure.
Match the format to the job: use Hunter's elements for a single direct-teaching lesson, the 5E cycle for an inquiry lesson, a Rosenshine-style review-model-practice sequence for skill building, and backward design for planning a whole unit. At Chalkbox, we build practical classroom tools and guides.
When planning an individual period, match your objective to one of these instructional pathways:
Starting with a clear instructional objective allows you to determine whether students need explicit modeling or open exploration. In practice, write the objective before choosing activities and keep the plan short enough to use.
Lesson plan formats differ primarily in where they place teacher explanation and student exploration. The table below outlines how the major instructional designs compare across purpose, structure, and original sources.
| Format | Best For | Core Parts | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Madeline Hunter Design | Direct instruction of skills and concepts | Anticipatory set, purpose, input, modeling, guided practice, checking for understanding, independent practice, closure | CSUN page; Wolfe (1987) on Hunter and Russell (1976) |
| BSCS 5E Model | Inquiry science and concept discovery | Engagement, exploration, explanation, elaboration, evaluation | Bybee et al. (BSCS) |
| Rosenshine Sequence | Systematic skill mastery and cognitive support | Review, modeling, guided practice, checking understanding, independent practice | Rosenshine (2012) |
| Backward Design (UbD) | Planning a whole unit | Not set out on the ASCD page; plan the unit before the daily lessons | Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe (ASCD) |
| Gradual Release Habit | A common classroom pacing habit | Teacher modeling, guided practice, independent practice (I do, we do, you do) | Common classroom practice |
Madeline Hunter's framework provides a structured set of instructional components designed for direct teacher-led instruction. On its science education page titled "Elements of Lesson Design (Hunter)," California State University Northridge (CSUN) lists eight distinct elements: Anticipatory Set, Purpose, Input, Modeling, Guided Practice, Checking For Understanding, Independent Practice, and Closure. Anticipatory Set provides a brief prompt linking earlier work to today's task. Purpose clarifies why the skill matters. Input delivers concepts and vocabulary, while Modeling demonstrates what students are to learn. The teacher then facilitates Guided Practice, monitors responses through Checking For Understanding, assigns Independent Practice, and summarizes the period during Closure.
Patricia Wolfe writes that the elements are not a recipe to be followed step by step in every lesson. Writing in the February 1987 issue of Educational Leadership published by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD), Patricia Wolfe addressed this misconception in her article, "What the 'Seven-Step Lesson Plan' Isn't!" Wolfe explained that Hunter and Russell originally described seven elements to consider when designing a lesson in 1976: anticipatory set, objective, input, modeling, checking for understanding, guided practice, and independent practice. The CSUN list differs by including eight elements, adding Purpose alongside objective material and including Closure.
Wolfe clarified that Hunter and Russell did not label these elements as chronological steps. The "Seven-Step Lesson Plan" label emerged later. Wolfe emphasized that these elements are not a recipe to follow step by step in every single meeting. Instead, they represent professional considerations for planning instruction. In some lessons, a teacher might work through all elements in order. In other lessons, reordering the elements proves more appropriate for the learning goal.
The 5E instructional model structures learning as a cycle where student investigation precedes direct teacher explanation. Described by Bybee et al. in The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins, Effectiveness, and Applications, the Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS) 5E Instructional Model consists of five phases: Engagement, Exploration, Explanation, Elaboration, and Evaluation. The framework descends from the Atkin and Karplus learning cycle developed in the early 1960s for the Science Curriculum Improvement Study (SCIS). BSCS has implemented the 5E framework across curriculum materials since the late 1980s, applying it to individual lessons, distinct units, and comprehensive multi-year programs.
Each phase in the 5E sequence serves a defined instructional function:
To see how these five stages function inside a practical science unit, review our guide to the 5E lesson plan.
Rosenshine synthesized findings from cognitive science, research on master teachers, and research on cognitive supports into 10 research-based principles. In his article "Principles of Instruction," published in the Spring 2012 issue of American Educator by the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), Rosenshine outlined ten research-based principles drawn from cognitive research, studies of master teachers, and work on cognitive scaffolds. Master teachers were defined in these studies as educators whose classrooms achieved the highest gains on achievement tests.
Rosenshine's sequence highlights several core instructional actions:
Rosenshine stressed that effective teachers conduct experiential and hands-on activities after students understand the foundational material, rather than before. His synthesis highlighted the importance of obtaining a high success rate during student practice. Citing a study of fourth-grade mathematics classrooms, Rosenshine noted that students in the most successful classrooms answered questions correctly 82 percent of the time, compared to 73 percent in the least successful rooms. The research suggests the optimal success rate appears to be about 80 percent.
In practice, plan a whole unit before drafting individual daily agendas. In Understanding by Design, Expanded 2nd Edition (370 pages, ISBN 978-1-4166-0035-0), ASCD describes the work as "an award-winning framework for curriculum design that extolled the virtues of backward planning." Treat it as the format to reach for when you are planning a whole unit before writing any daily plan. To sketch a unit, try our unit plan generator.
Often summarized as "I do, we do, you do," gradual release describes a standard classroom pacing habit. The teacher demonstrates the skill first, leads the class through collaborative guided practice, and finally transitions students into independent work.
A district may require its own template, so check before switching formats. None of the formats here is a substitute for that requirement. For the Philippines DepEd DLP format, see the DepEd lesson plan format. The four formats and the gradual release habit still help you decide what to put inside a required template.
Modern digital tools can format lesson plans into direct instruction, inquiry, or gradual release templates. An automated planner can populate any of these instructional formats. You can generate custom outlines quickly using our free lesson plan generator or evaluate options across our list of AI lesson plan generator alternatives.
Whenever you use automated planning software, you must personally verify the output. Select your target objective, choose the structure that matches your pedagogical task, and draft your next outline using these lesson plan formats.
Join the Chalkbox list for free printable packs and new tools — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
The main types of lesson plans include direct instruction models, inquiry learning cycles, cognitive skill sequences, and backward design unit frameworks. Direct instruction outlines like Madeline Hunter's elements guide explicit teacher modeling. Inquiry models like the BSCS 5E cycle organize exploration before formal vocabulary instruction.
The Madeline Hunter format is a set of lesson-design elements: anticipatory set, purpose, input, modeling, guided practice, checking for understanding, independent practice and closure, according to one university list. The format identifies main elements such as modeling, guided practice, and checking for understanding. It serves as a planning guide for explicit teaching rather than an inflexible, mandatory checklist.
The 5E lesson plan format is an inquiry model consisting of engagement, exploration, explanation, elaboration, and evaluation. Used in BSCS curriculum materials since the late 1980s, the model descends from the Atkin and Karplus learning cycle of the early 1960s.
No, you do not have to use all Hunter elements in every lesson period. As Patricia Wolfe observed in Educational Leadership, Hunter and Russell described instructional elements to consider rather than a rigid seven-step recipe. Teachers may use all elements in order or reorder them based on the lesson objective.
No single format wins for new teachers, and the right one varies by school, so check your school's requirements first. In practice, write the objective before choosing activities and keep the plan short enough to use. Direct instruction works for showing a skill, while the 5E cycle fits an inquiry lesson.
Yes, an artificial intelligence (AI) lesson planner can generate draft lessons in direct instruction, 5E, or backward design formats. While automated generators structure the instructional sequence quickly, the classroom teacher remains responsible for reviewing the content and checking the accuracy of all curriculum standards codes.
Lesson plan requirements differ by school and district. This guide is general information for educators; check your own school's template and policies.