A free Blooket game hosts up to 60 players and a free Kahoot game up to 40, so class size often decides it.
Blooket provides a free tier that supports up to 60 players in a live game, while Kahoot caps its free school plan at 40 participants. That single participant threshold determines which platform works out of the box for a teacher without purchasing an individual upgrade. Both services host digital question sets and live review sessions for classrooms. Because both platforms run multiple-choice trivia activities, many educators assume the primary difference lies in visual style. It does not. The practical dividing line begins with roster caps, expands into paid tier ladders, and continues through the specific question formats unlocked at each price point.
Blooket structures its service around game modes, set creation, and search, maintaining a 60-player threshold on its baseline account. Kahoot names its baseline tier Kahoot! Go, pairing a 40-participant room ceiling with basic reporting and a distinct set of question types. When evaluating blooket vs kahoot, matching roster counts to these concrete cutoffs saves instructional time and eliminates mid-lesson disruptions. Examining the arithmetic of your class roster before building a question set ensures the software will actually admit every student who enters the room.
In the guides we publish here, the most common mistake is selecting a platform before counting the maximum number of students who will join a single room. A teacher running a single section of 28 pupils faces a completely different set of software limitations than two teachers combining sections for a joint review period. If a combined session exceeds 40 students, Kahoot requires an upgraded subscription tier to host the group, whereas Blooket permits up to 60 players on its Starter tier without cost.
Another recurring oversight involves assuming all question formats exist across every plan level. Educators sometimes write a full curriculum unit containing open-ended prompts, numerical ranges, or specialized inputs, only to discover those inputs demand a specific paid upgrade tier. Reviewing the documented capabilities of baseline and paid plans before planning questions prevents painful rewrites later.
Teachers also occasionally overlook annual billing terms. Moving beyond the free tier of a classroom review platform introduces budgetary commitments that vary significantly by provider. Checking whether an upgrade requires an annual prepayment or offers separate institutional pathways helps keep classroom expenses predictable. If you are also evaluating other options beyond these two, our breakdown of Blooket vs Gimkit details how participant counts and session mechanics operate across alternative platforms.
Blooket organizes its entry-level offering as the Starter tier. Under Starter, Blooket allows educators to host live sessions for up to 60 players simultaneously. The Starter tier provides access to Create or Discover Sets, Unique Game Modes, and Question Set Search. Teachers can search through public question sets created by other educators or build custom question sets tailored directly to their immediate curriculum standards.
For rosters or events that exceed 60 simultaneous users, Blooket provides an upgraded subscription known as Plus. Blooket Plus expands live-game capacity up to 300 players, with the exception of Racing and team modes. Alongside higher room capacity, Plus includes all Starter features, granting ongoing access to Create or Discover Sets, Unique Game Modes, and Question Set Search. Blooket also states that Plus subscribers obtain game modes that are only available to Plus users.
The exact subscription pricing for Blooket Plus changes over time and is not published directly within this guide. Teachers considering an upgrade can check the official details directly on the Blooket Plus features page to verify current subscription terms, active features, and institutional ordering options.
Kahoot offers its baseline functionality for educators through a free plan designated as Kahoot! Go. This free tier supports up to 40 participants per game. Kahoot! Go includes question types such as Quiz, True/False, and images as answers. It also provides teachers with ready-made content, presentation templates, flashcards, and basic reports that are limited to 3 participants.
When a school or classroom requires larger participant allowances or expanded response formats, Kahoot structures its service into four distinct paid educational plans based on annual billing:
Kahoot specifies that educational plans require annual prepayment on its checkout pages. The provider notes that prices may differ by geographic region and can change over time. Teachers can confirm current rates, question configurations, and regional terms directly through the Kahoot plans for schools and teachers page. For an overview of how other tools stack up against this pricing structure, explore our guide to Kahoot alternatives.
Evaluating blooket or kahoot comes down to precise roster numbers. When working with 40 or fewer students, both platforms function on their free tiers. A standard single-period roster of 25 to 35 students fits inside the 40-participant ceiling of Kahoot! Go and the 60-participant ceiling of Blooket Starter. Under those conditions, a teacher can select either service without encountering an immediate room-capacity paywall.
Once a roster counts more than 40 players, the free tiers diverge. A session containing 45 students exceeds the 40-player limit of Kahoot! Go. To host that session on Kahoot, an educator must hold at least a Bronze plan, which supports 50 participants for $36 per year under annual billing. In contrast, Blooket accommodates 45 students entirely within its free Starter tier, since its free limit reaches 60 players.
When an instructional event involves more than 50 students, Kahoot requires at least the Silver plan, which supports up to 100 participants for $84 per year. Blooket continues to host sessions up to 60 players on Starter. For gatherings that involve more than 60 students, both platforms require paid tiers. Kahoot covers groups between 51 and 100 participants on Silver, groups between 101 and 200 participants on Gold ($144 annually), and groups between 201 and 800 participants on One ($228 annually). Blooket covers groups up to 300 participants through Blooket Plus, excluding Racing and team modes. To see how these caps compare across the broader market, read our review of the best free classroom review game platforms.
The types of items you intend to place on a quiz also shape the decision between these two review tools. On Kahoot! Go, teachers can deliver Quiz questions, True/False questions, and items featuring images as answers. If an educator wants students to submit typed text responses or adjust a numerical slider, Kahoot reserves those formats for its Gold plan at $144 per year, which also provides all other question types. Teachers seeking AI content generation can access that capability starting at the Bronze tier. In terms of session data, Kahoot! Go includes basic reports limited to 3 participants, meaning teachers needing comprehensive participant data must evaluate higher subscription levels.
Blooket allows teachers on its free Starter tier to build new sets or discover existing materials using Question Set Search. Starter members access Create or Discover Sets, Unique Game Modes, and Question Set Search. When educators upgrade to Blooket Plus, they retain all of those Starter capabilities while gaining game modes that are only available to Plus users alongside the 300-player hosting capacity. If you want to explore other review tools that structure their question types differently, see our guide to Blooket alternatives for classroom review games.
Blooket is not the right fit for an educator who must host a single live review session for more than 300 participants. Even on Blooket Plus, the platform caps live sessions at 300 players, and that capacity ceiling explicitly excludes Racing and team modes. If an auditorium assembly or grade-wide event brings together 400 students at the same time, Blooket cannot accommodate that group size under its documented Plus specifications.
Blooket is also not the ideal choice for an instructor who requires published fixed pricing tiers with documented question formats like numeric slider inputs or native AI generation tools within a tiered school subscription ladder. Kahoot documents those specific mechanisms directly across its Bronze, Silver, Gold, and One tiers, whereas Blooket centers its subscription differences primarily on game mode availability, question set management, and room capacity.
Kahoot is not the right fit for a teacher who needs to run free live games for a combined class section of 45 to 60 students without paying for an individual license. Because Kahoot! Go enforces a strict cap of 40 participants, any class session containing 41 or more students requires an immediate subscription upgrade to at least the Bronze plan at $36 per year. A teacher with no classroom budget who regularly teaches groups of 50 students will encounter room blocks on Kahoot.
Kahoot is also not the right fit for an educator who needs detailed reporting for an entire class on a free account. Because Kahoot! Go limits basic reports to 3 participants, a teacher relying solely on the free version is working from a free plan whose basic reports are listed for only 3 participants. Educators who require complete session records for 30 students must account for the cost of upgrading to a paid tier.
If Kahoot expanded its free participant limit from 40 to 60 or more students, the baseline roster difference between the two tools would disappear for standard double-period classes. Under those terms, teachers with rosters between 41 and 60 players would no longer be directed toward a paid Kahoot plan simply to get all students logged into the same room.
Similarly, if Blooket lowered its free Starter capacity to match smaller limits or restricted its baseline question set search, educators prioritizing cost-free hosting would need to recalculate their options. If Blooket published a high-capacity tier accommodating 800 or more participants, it would directly challenge Kahoot's One plan for school-wide and auditorium events. Until such policy shifts occur, class size remains the most reliable metric for deciding between them.
Pick Blooket when your class roster exceeds 40 students, your budget requires a completely free platform that supports up to 60 players, and you want access to unique game modes with public question set search. Pick Kahoot when your classes fit comfortably within 40 participants, or when your school can fund a paid tier to access slider inputs, type answer question formats, AI content creation, and large-group hosting up to 800 participants. Draft your next set of prompts with the free quiz generator so you have clean question text ready to paste directly into either service.
Join the Chalkbox list for free printable packs and new tools — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Neither platform is universally better, as the best choice depends on class size and required question types. Blooket supports up to 60 participants on its free tier, making it practical for larger rosters without spending departmental funds. Kahoot offers a free cap of 40 participants and provides a structured ladder of paid tiers that unlock advanced question formats like slider inputs and type answer fields.
Yes, Blooket provides a free Starter plan that allows educators to create question sets, search existing libraries, and host live games for up to 60 players. For teachers needing room capacity up to 300 players or access to exclusive game modes, Blooket offers an upgraded Plus subscription. The specific cost of Blooket Plus is not published in this guide, so educators should check Blooket's official website to view current pricing.
A free Blooket game accommodates up to 60 players on its Starter tier. A free Kahoot game accommodates up to 40 participants on its Kahoot! Go plan. Any roster with more than 40 students exceeds Kahoot's free allowance and requires an upgraded plan, while Blooket continues to host up to 60 students at no charge.
Kahoot offers a free plan for teachers called Kahoot! Go, which supports up to 40 participants per session. This baseline tier includes Quiz questions, True/False questions, images as answers, templates, flashcards, ready-made content, and basic reports limited to 3 participants. Teachers who need larger participant allowances, AI creation tools, or advanced response formats like slider inputs must upgrade to paid plans starting at $36 per year under annual prepayment.
For a class of 41 to 60 students, Blooket accommodates the entire group on its free tier, whereas Kahoot requires an upgrade to at least its Bronze plan ($36 per year) or Silver plan ($84 per year). For groups between 61 and 300 students, both platforms require paid plans, with Blooket Plus accommodating up to 300 participants (except in Racing and team modes) and Kahoot offering Silver (100 participants) and Gold (200 participants). For very large events exceeding 300 participants, Kahoot is the viable option between the two, offering its One plan for up to 800 participants.
Specific question-set import and export options are not documented here, so teachers should check the help resources on each vendor's site to see their current file transfer capabilities. However, a master list of trivia items or review prompts drafted once in the Chalkbox [quiz generator](/assessment/quiz-generator/) can easily be pasted manually into both tools. Standard formats like multiple-choice and True/False work smoothly across both platforms.
This guide is general information for educators, not an endorsement of any specific product. Tools, features and pricing change frequently; verify current details on each product’s own site before choosing one.